Storm Chaser, on 11 February 2012 - 10:26 PM, said:
I guess I'd like to see the USHL stay in the Midwest, from a fan perspective it's nice with teams relatively close together. If I was to expand any I'd say maybe Missouri, Kansas, Minnesota.
Unfortunately, all three of those fall into the "bee, there, done that, failed" category.
* While Minnesota may be the state of hockey, there are no good cities that are candidates. Either they are too small and high school hockey rules, or are big enough but have a D1 team (i.e. Duluth, Mankato, St. Cloud and Bemidji might all be USHL candidates sans their WCHA teams). And given the general predisposition to dislike the USHL, it's not an option.
* There was a team in Topeka. Didn't draw and now that's a NAHL team (or was the last time I checked). Olathe was rumored but never developed. I'm familiar enough with other options.
* St. Louis - actually St. Charles - was an unmitigated disaster in a rink better suited for junior B. That's not to say there aren't medium sized cities elsewhere that might work, but given the travel, etc., they'd better be able to make money.
I agree with your general sentiment that staying in the midwestern footprint is desireable, however. Unfortunately, the best options might end up being minor pro cities that switch, a la Muskegon. And it's always tough for this league to follow in the steps of pro teams. (And I don't think anyone wants to see hockey fail at any level, even if that opens a door for the USHL.)